设为首页收藏本站

弧论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 5166|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

解决百万美元悬赏问题:“黎曼猜想”的新思路

[复制链接]

5905

主题

6600

帖子

7160

积分

坛主

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

积分
7160
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-4-14 20:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
解决百万美元悬赏问题:“黎曼猜想”的新思路

2017-04-15
DeepTech深科技

德国数学家波恩哈德·黎曼于 1859 年提出:黎曼 ζ(s) 函数的非平凡零点都在复平面上的一条实部为 0.5 的直线上。

近日数学家发现,黎曼 ζ(s) 函数的解和另外一个方程的解有关系,而后者很有可能是证明黎曼猜想的一条捷径。如果这个结果能被严格证明,作为数学界最大猜想之一的黎曼假设将获得最终证明,证明者即能摘得克雷数学研究所的1百万美元悬赏。

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

黎曼猜想自 1859 年提出之后的 100 多年里,数学家试图走出证明的关键一步:找到一种算子函数。今天,这一梦寐以求的函数可能终于出现了。

多杰·布罗迪(Dorje Brody)是伦敦布鲁内尔大学数学物理学家,也是相关论文的共同作者。他表示:这是首次发现如此简洁的算子,其特征值(eigenvalue)与黎曼 ζ(s) 函数的非平凡零点精确相关。

接下来,数学家要证明下一步:所有特征值都是实数。如果确实能证明这一点,黎曼猜想将最终获得证明。布罗迪和其他两位共同作者——来自华盛顿大学圣路易斯分校数学物理学家卡尔·本德(Carl Bender)和来自西安大略大学的马库斯·穆勒(Markus Müller)——在《Physical Review Letters》上发表了相关论文。

素数空间
黎曼猜想对数论,特别是素数理论有重要意义。1859年,德国数学家伯恩哈德·黎曼(Bernhard Riemann)研究了素数的分布问题——给定整数N,有多少个小于N的素数?

黎曼推测,所有小于N的素数的分布,跟黎曼 ζ(s) 函数的非平凡零点相关。(所谓的零点,即为使方程等于零的解(s值)。而当是负偶数时,方程则一定为零,因此这些零点被看作是 ζ(s) 函数的平凡零点,并不重要。)

黎曼假设认为:所有非平凡零点都落在复平面上的一条实部等于0.5的直线上,即实部总是等于0.5,而虚部不同。

150年来,数学家发现了不计其数的非平凡零点,所有的点的实部也确实是0.5,跟黎曼的猜想相符。因此,数学家普遍认为黎曼猜想是正确的,并已经基于该猜想做了很多工作。但是,黎曼猜想本身,至今未被证明

等效解

函数理论提供了证明黎曼猜想的有力工具。它指出:所有非平凡零点构成一个离散实数的集合。有趣的是,某物理学上有广泛应用的函数——微分算子——其特征值跟非平凡零点的集合很相似。

20 世纪 90 年代初,这种相似性让一些数学家思考:可能存在某种微分算子,其特征值就是黎曼 ζ(s) 函数的非平凡零点。

今天,这个猜想被称为希尔伯特-波利亚猜想,尽管大卫·希尔伯特(David Hilbert)和乔治·波利亚(George Pólya)都没有在这方面发表任何著作。希尔伯特-波利亚猜想包括 2 步:1)找到 1 个算子,证明其特征值就是黎曼 ζ(s) 函数的非平凡零点;2)证明这些特征值都是实数。

目前,相关的研究工作主要集中在第 1 步。数学家已经确认了一种算子,其特征值精确对应于黎曼 ζ(s) 函数的非平凡零点。第 2 步工作刚刚开始,数学家甚至还不能确定,证明第 2 步到底有多难。他们能确定的是,还需要更多的工作。

算子

有趣的是,这种起关键作用的算子跟量子物理有密切联系。1999年,数学物理学家米切尔·博里(Michael Berry)和约拿单·基廷(Jonathan Keating)研究希尔伯特-波利亚猜想时,他们提出了另外一个重要的猜想:如果这种算子确实存在,那么它应该对应于一种具有某些特性的理论量子系统。这个猜想被称为博里-基廷猜想,但是之前谁也没找到这个系统。

如今,布罗迪称,他们确定了博里-基廷哈密尔顿算子的量子化条件,并基本证明了博里-基廷猜想

哈密尔顿算子通常用来描述一个物理系统的能量,但是博里-基廷哈密尔顿算子的奇异之处在于,至少目前,科学家认为,它并不对应于任何物理系统,而是一个纯数学函数。

布罗迪表示,他们的证明工作基于启发性分析方法,这种方法源于已经有大约15年左右历史的伪厄米PT-对称量子理论。因此,他们将文章发表在《Physical Review Letters》,而不是数学期刊。

希尔伯特-波利亚猜想认为,关键的哈密尔顿算子应该也是厄米算子,而量子理论中,也通常要求哈密尔顿算子同时也是厄米算子,因此希尔伯特-波利亚猜想和量子理论有天然的联系。布罗迪等人提出了希尔伯特-波利亚猜想的伪厄米形式,并将其作为下一步的研究重点。

真正的解

现在,最大的挑战是证明:该算子的特征值都是实数

总体来说,科学家对克服这个挑战表示乐观。原因在于,他们有一样法宝可以利用,那就是 PT 对称性。PT 对称性是量子物理的概念——如果该系统满足 PT 对称性,当你改变四维时空的的符号时,变换后的结果和变换之前相同。

尽管真实的世界一般不满足 PT 对称性,物理学家构建的这种算子却具有这种特性。然而,科学家现在需要证明,这种算子虚部的 PT 对称性被打破。若能做到这一点,则该算子的特征值都是实数——最终证明黎曼猜想。

科学家普遍认为,黎曼猜想的证明对计算机科学,特别是密码学有重大意义。此外,数学家也希望知道论证的结果到底会对理解基础数学原理带来些什么影响。

布罗迪表示,尽管他们还不能预测研究结果对数论的具体影响,但有理由期待后继成果。


New insight into proving math's million-dollar problem: the Riemann hypothesis (Update)April 7, 2017 by Lisa Zyga

                               
登录/注册后可看大图
.
In 1859, Riemann hypothesized that the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the vertical line (½ + it) on the complex plane, at which the real part is always ½. Credit: Jan Homann, Wikimedia Commons. Top: Riemann zeta function. Bottom: The new operator function.
(Phys.org)—Researchers have discovered that the solutions to a famous mathematical function called the Riemann zeta function correspond to the solutions of another, different kind of function that may make it easier to solve one of the biggest problems in mathematics: the Riemann hypothesis. If the results can be rigorously verified, then it would finally prove the Riemann hypothesis, which is worth a $1,000,000 Millennium Prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute.

While the Riemann hypothesis dates back to 1859, for the past 100 years or so mathematicians have been trying to find an operator function like the one discovered here, as it is considered a key step in the proof.
"To our knowledge, this is the first time that an explicit—and perhaps surprisingly relatively simple—operator has been identified whose eigenvalues ['solutions' in matrix terminology] correspond exactly to the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function," Dorje Brody, a mathematical physicist at Brunel University London and coauthor of the new study, told Phys.org.
What still remains to be proven is the second key step: that all of the eigenvalues are real numbers rather than imaginary ones. If future work can prove this, then it would finally prove the Riemann hypothesis.
Brody and his coauthors, mathematical physicists Carl Bender of Washington University in St. Louis and Markus Müller of the University of Western Ontario, have published their work in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

Spacing of primes
The Riemann hypothesis holds such a strong allure because it is deeply connected to number theory and, in particular, the prime numbers. In his 1859 paper, German mathematician Bernhard Riemann investigated the distribution of the prime numbers—or more precisely, the problem "given an integer N, how many prime numbers are there that are smaller than N?"
Riemann conjectured that the distribution of the prime numbers smaller than N is related to the nontrivial zeros of what's now called the Riemann zeta function, ζ(s). (The zeros are the solutions, or the values of s that make the function equal to zero. Although it was easy for mathematicians to see that there are zeros whenever s is a negative even number, these zeros are considered trivial zeros and are not the interesting part of the function.)
Riemann's hypothesis was that all of the nontrivial zeros lie along a single vertical line (½ + it) in the complex plane—meaning their real component is always ½, while their imaginary component i varies as you go up and down the line.
Over the past 150 years, mathematicians have found literally trillions of nontrivial zeros, and all of them have a real of component of ½, just as Riemann thought. It's widely believed that the Riemann hypothesis is true, and much work has been done based on this assumption. But despite intensive efforts, the Riemann hypothesis—that all of the infinitely many zeros lie on this single line—has not yet been proved.

Identical solutions
One of the most helpful clues for proving the Riemann hypothesis has come from function theory, which reveals that the values of the imaginary part, t, at which the function vanishes are discrete numbers. This suggests that the nontrivial zeros form a set of real and discrete numbers, which is just like the eigenvalues of another function called a differential operator, which is widely used in physics.
In the early 1900s, this similarity led some mathematicians to wonder whether there really exists a differential operator whose eigenvalues correspond exactly to the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Today this idea is called the Hilbert-Pólya conjecture, named after David Hilbert and George Pólya—despite the fact that neither of them published anything about it.
"Since there is no publication by Hilbert or Pólya, the exact statement of the Hilbert-Pólya program is subject to some extent to interpretation, but it is probably not unreasonable to say that it consists of two steps: (a) find an operator whose eigenvalues correspond to the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function; and (b) determine whether the eigenvalues are real," Brody said.
"The main focus of our work so far has been on step (a)," he said. "We have identified an operator whose eigenvalues correspond exactly to the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function. We are only beginning to think about step (b), and indeed how to tackle this challenge. Whether it will be difficult or easy to fill in the missing steps toward step (b), at this point we cannot speculate—further work is needed to get a better feeling as to the scale of difficulty involved."

The operator
One of the interesting things about the newly discovered operator is that it has close ties with quantum physics.
In 1999, when mathematical physicists Michael Berry and Jonathan Keating were investigating the Hilbert-Pólya conjecture, they made another important conjecture. If such an operator exists, they said, then it should correspond to a theoretical quantum system with particular properties. This is now called the Berry-Keating conjecture. But no one has ever found such a system before now, and this is a second important aspect of the new work.
"We have identified a quantization condition for the Berry-Keating Hamiltonian, thus essentially verifying the validity of the Berry-Keating conjecture," Brody said.
Hamiltonians are often used to describe the energy of physical systems. The new operator, however, doesn't appear to describe any physical system, but is rather a purely mathematical function.
"It may be disappointing, but such a Hamiltonian does not seem to represent physical systems in any obvious way; or at least so far we found no indication that our Hamiltonian corresponds to any physical system," Brody said.
"But one might then ask 'why publish in PRL?' The answer is because many of the techniques used for some heuristic analysis in our paper that are suggestive are borrowed from techniques of pseudo-Hermitian PT-symmetric quantum theory developed over the past 15 years or so. The conventional understanding of the Hilbert-Pólya conjecture is that the operator (Hamiltonian) should be Hermitian, and one naturally links this to quantum theory whereby Hamiltonians are conventionally demanded to be Hermitian. We are proposing a pseudo-Hermitian form of the Hilbert-Pólya program, which to us seems worthwhile exploring further."

Real solutions
Now the biggest challenge that remains is to show that the operator's eigenvalues are real numbers.
In general, the researchers are optimistic that the eigenvalues are actually real, and in their paper they present a strong argument for this based on PT symmetry, a concept from quantum physics. Basically, PT symmetry says that you can change the signs of all four components of space-time (three space or "parity" dimensions and one time dimension), and, if the system is PT-symmetric, then the result will look the same as the original.
Although nature in general is not PT-symmetric, the operator that the physicists constructed is. But now the researchers want to show that this symmetry gets broken. As they explain in their paper, if it can be shown that the PT symmetry is broken for the imaginary part of the operator, then it would follow that the eigenvalues are all real numbers, which would finally constitute the long-awaited proof of the Riemann hypothesis.
It's generally considered that a proof of the Riemann hypothesis will be very useful in computer science, especially cryptography. The researchers also want to determine what their results might actually mean for understanding more fundamental mathematical principles.
"What we have explored so far contains little number-theoretic insights; whereas one might expect that, given its importance in number theory, surely any attempt that successfully makes progress on establishing the Riemann hypothesis would offer number-theoretic insights," Brody said. "Of course this need not be the case at all, but nevertheless it would be of interest to explore whether any of the dynamical aspects of the hypothetical system described by our Hamiltonian might be linked to certain number-theoretic results. In this regard, semi-classical analysis on our Hamiltonian would be one of the next objectives."


Explore further: A zero sum game
More information: Carl M. Bender, Dorje C. Brody, and Markus P. Müller. "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function." Physical Review Letters. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.130201
Journal reference: Physical Review Letters


大道至简 万物于弧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

手机版|Archiver|小黑屋|国际弧学研究会    

GMT-7, 2024-5-5 09:27 , Processed in 0.513149 second(s), 22 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表